Dan Stewart on a refurbishment rehash

Over on a steamed colleague, Dan Stewart’s blog, there’s some RIBA kicking.

The Building architecture correspondent doesn’t think much of the Institute’s plan for using refurbishment to extricate architects for recession, particularly as outlined by Building Design. His criticisms are twofold. Firstly, the idea is ‘at best aspirational and at worst fanstastical.’ Secondly, he says, it has been a longstanding Building idea as laid out in the 99% Campaign and “key RIBA policy for at least as long.” Nothing new there, then.

But the so-called 99% problem is like that; its solution is vital to tackling emissions yet it is seemingly intractable. It is hardly more convincing to use it to solve another pressing issue, that of widespread layoffs within the architectural sector.

I wonder as well whether expensive architects are the right people to carry out this work, anyway? Or do we need to train a new type of specialist labourers possessing a particular skill set to carry it out?

Related posts:

1. 10 most popular posts of 2009 Arse about tit given my last post but here’s the...
2. New blogger in town ...
3. Refurbishment question time: Roofing Right. Have got some sarf London roofers round my gaff...
4. Some optimism ...
5. Green refurbishment the hard way Guest post by Robert Cohen, technical director at Camco, who...